The so-called 94 billion case was the topic of an investigation report despatched to the prosecutor. The investigating choose to whom the case had been entrusted had subsequently refused to open a judicial investigation. Requested concerning the perspective of her colleague, the president of Ofnac believes that it’s her most absolute proper. There isn’t any authorized violation on this case. “The analyzing Justice of the Peace has the appropriate to refuse to tell given that he justifies his determination. I did it as a choose. However for this case, I have no idea what was the motivation of the choose to refuse to tell and the motivation of the indictment chamber to verify the choice of the investigating choose ”, she informs.
Seynabou Ndiaye Diakhaté to recall that the members of Ofnac are sure by two ideas: « the secrecy of the investigation which prohibits us from disclosing the contents of the file and the precept of the presumption of innocence, universally recognized ». “It’s due to this fact adequate to say that such and such an individual has been prosecuted in such a case or such individual has been questioned at Ofnac for this presumption of innocence to show right into a presumption of guilt. That is all that forestalls me from speaking concerning the content material. However the report was certainly filed on the stage of the general public prosecutor, ”she mentioned.
In October 2018, at a press convention, Ousmane Sonko accused Mamour Diallo, the director of estates within the Republic of Senegal, of getting embezzled 94 billion CFA francs when he was dealing with a file associated to a land title. Clearly, that is an previous dispute between households of the Leboue neighborhood and the State over land in Rufisque. Ofnac had deposited on the desk of the general public prosecutor its report on this affair.
Emedia
Variety of Views | 336 Occasions |